Outpatient Treatment of Low‐risk Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review

Амбулаторное лечение легочной эмболии низкого риска в эпоху прямых оральных антикоагулянтов: систематический обзор
Jeffrey Allen Kline, Brandon C. Maughan, Lisa Frueh, Marian S. McDonagh, Bryan Casciere
2020-08-11

direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC)low-risk pulmonary embolismmajor adverse outcomes (mortality, recurrent VTE, major bleeding)outpatient treatmentsystematic review
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines have supported outpatient treatment of low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) since 2014, but adoption of this practice has been slow. Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is now as common as vitamin K antagonist treatment, but data are sparse regarding outcomes for patients with low-risk PE treated with DOACs as outpatients. We conducted a systematic review of literature on outcomes of outpatient management for PE, including comparisons to inpatient treatment and differences by anticoagulant class. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, PubMed, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, and ICTRN for studies published from January 1980 through February 2019 using a predefined strategy developed with a medical librarian. We included English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective nonrandomized trials (NRTs) of adult patients diagnosed with acute, symptomatic PE, and discharged from the emergency department or within 48 hours. Our primary outcome included four major adverse outcomes (all-cause mortality, PE-related mortality, recurrent VTE, and major bleeding) within 30 and 90 days. A preplanned subanalysis of high-quality studies assessed outcomes associated with different anticoagulation treatment classes. RESULTS: Our initial search identified 6,818 records, of which 12 studies (four RCT, eight NRT) with a total of 3,191 patients were included in the review. All RCTs and six NRTs were determined to have low to moderate risk of bias and were classified as high quality. Outpatients in these studies (n = 1,814) had rates of 90-day major adverse outcomes below 1%, including all-cause mortality (0.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4% to 1.2%), PE-related mortality (0.06%, 95% CI = 0.01% to 0.3%), recurrent VTE (0.8%, 95% CI = 0.5% to 1.4%), and major bleeding (0.8%, 95% CI = 0.5% to 1.4%). Exploratory analysis revealed no association between anticoagulant treatment class and rates of major adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Among patients with low-risk PE treated as outpatients, few patients experienced major adverse outcomes such as mortality, recurrent VTE, or major bleeding within 90 days.
1
Among 1,814 outpatients with low-risk PE, 90-day all-cause mortality was 0.7% (95% CI 0.4%–1.2%).
2
Exploratory analysis found no association between anticoagulant class (including DOACs versus others) and rates of major adverse outcomes in outpatient low-risk PE.
3
Most included RCTs and six NRTs were assessed as high quality with low to moderate risk of bias.
4
Ninety-day PE-related mortality (0.06%, 95% CI 0.01%–0.3%), recurrent VTE (0.8%, 95% CI 0.5%–1.4%), and major bleeding (0.8%, 95% CI 0.5%–1.4%) were all below 1%.
5
Systematic review included 12 studies (4 RCTs, 8 NRTs) totaling 3,191 patients with acute symptomatic PE discharged within 48 hours.

Outpatient management of adult patients with acute low-risk pulmonary embolism

Rates of major adverse outcomes (all-cause mortality, PE-related mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and major bleeding) within 30 and 90 days, and their association with anticoagulant treatment class (DOACs versus others)

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-08-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
35
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Jeffrey Allen Kline
Brandon C. Maughan
Lisa Frueh
Marian S. McDonagh
Bryan Casciere
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%