Outpatient Treatment of Low‐risk Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review
Амбулаторное лечение легочной эмболии низкого риска в эпоху прямых оральных антикоагулянтов: систематический обзор
2020-08-11
SCID: 54.1/wb5nrhr7
Discuss with AI
direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC)low-risk pulmonary embolismmajor adverse outcomes (mortality, recurrent VTE, major bleeding)outpatient treatmentsystematic review
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines have supported outpatient treatment of low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) since 2014, but adoption of this practice has been slow. Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is now as common as vitamin K antagonist treatment, but data are sparse regarding outcomes for patients with low-risk PE treated with DOACs as outpatients. We conducted a systematic review of literature on outcomes of outpatient management for PE, including comparisons to inpatient treatment and differences by anticoagulant class. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, PubMed, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, and ICTRN for studies published from January 1980 through February 2019 using a predefined strategy developed with a medical librarian. We included English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective nonrandomized trials (NRTs) of adult patients diagnosed with acute, symptomatic PE, and discharged from the emergency department or within 48 hours. Our primary outcome included four major adverse outcomes (all-cause mortality, PE-related mortality, recurrent VTE, and major bleeding) within 30 and 90 days. A preplanned subanalysis of high-quality studies assessed outcomes associated with different anticoagulation treatment classes. RESULTS: Our initial search identified 6,818 records, of which 12 studies (four RCT, eight NRT) with a total of 3,191 patients were included in the review. All RCTs and six NRTs were determined to have low to moderate risk of bias and were classified as high quality. Outpatients in these studies (n = 1,814) had rates of 90-day major adverse outcomes below 1%, including all-cause mortality (0.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4% to 1.2%), PE-related mortality (0.06%, 95% CI = 0.01% to 0.3%), recurrent VTE (0.8%, 95% CI = 0.5% to 1.4%), and major bleeding (0.8%, 95% CI = 0.5% to 1.4%). Exploratory analysis revealed no association between anticoagulant treatment class and rates of major adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Among patients with low-risk PE treated as outpatients, few patients experienced major adverse outcomes such as mortality, recurrent VTE, or major bleeding within 90 days.
Key Findings
1
Among 1,814 outpatients with low-risk PE, 90-day all-cause mortality was 0.7% (95% CI 0.4%–1.2%).
2
Exploratory analysis found no association between anticoagulant class (including DOACs versus others) and rates of major adverse outcomes in outpatient low-risk PE.
3
Most included RCTs and six NRTs were assessed as high quality with low to moderate risk of bias.
4
Ninety-day PE-related mortality (0.06%, 95% CI 0.01%–0.3%), recurrent VTE (0.8%, 95% CI 0.5%–1.4%), and major bleeding (0.8%, 95% CI 0.5%–1.4%) were all below 1%.
5
Systematic review included 12 studies (4 RCTs, 8 NRTs) totaling 3,191 patients with acute symptomatic PE discharged within 48 hours.
Research Object
Outpatient management of adult patients with acute low-risk pulmonary embolism
Research Subject
Rates of major adverse outcomes (all-cause mortality, PE-related mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and major bleeding) within 30 and 90 days, and their association with anticoagulant treatment class (DOACs versus others)
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-08-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
35
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai8
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement2009
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials2019
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions2016
Oral Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism2012
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS)2019
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared to rivaroxaban in acute VTE in the real world2019