Parasocial relationships with artificial intelligence (AI): A systematic review of benefits and risks
Парасоциальные отношения с искусственным интеллектом (ИИ): систематический обзор преимуществ и рисков
2026-05-01
SCID: 54.1/xzddsbg3
Discuss with AI
AI parasocial relationshipsPRISMA guidelinesemotional dependenceresponsible AI designsystematic review
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have transformed AI systems into increasingly interactive and relational agents, raising questions about the consequences of the perceived sense of intimacy and reciprocity formed with AI systems. The present systematic review synthesised empirical evidence on the benefits and risks of AI parasocial relationships across diverse AI agents and contexts. Following PRISMA guidelines, 39 empirical records were identified and analysed using narrative thematic analysis. Through this, five key benefits of AI parasocial relationships were identified, namely personal development and adaptive functioning, emotional support, social needs fulfilment, enjoyment and entertainment, and community participation and social belonging. However, these perceived relationships also carry risks, consisting of commercial persuasion and consumer influence, displacement of human relationships, emotional dependence, privacy and data exploitation concerns, and behavioural addiction and compulsivity. The review also highlights research gaps including the lack of consistent definition and measurement of AI parasocial relationships, and underscores the need for greater theoretical clarity, longitudinal research, and responsible AI design to maximise benefits while mitigating potential harms for users.
Key Findings
1
A PRISMA-guided systematic review synthesized 39 empirical records on parasocial relationships across diverse AI agents and contexts.
2
Five benefits were identified: personal development and adaptive functioning, emotional support, social-needs fulfillment, enjoyment and entertainment, and community participation and belonging.
3
Five risks were identified: commercial persuasion, displacement of human relationships, emotional dependence, privacy and data exploitation, and behavioral addiction or compulsivity.
4
The literature lacks consistent definitions and measures of AI parasocial relationships, limiting theoretical comparability across studies.
5
The review calls for theoretical clarification, longitudinal research, and responsible AI design to maximize benefits while mitigating harms.
Research Object
Parasocial relationships with artificial intelligence systems
Research Subject
The benefits and risks of perceived intimacy and reciprocity in AI parasocial relationships
Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-05-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
7
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest