The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Заявление PRISMA 2020: обновлённое руководство по представлению систематических обзоров
Elie A. Akl, Matthew J. Page, Isabelle Boutron, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Tianjing Li, Lesley Stewart, Penny Whiting, Joanne E. McKenzie, Sue Brennan, James Thomas, Vivian Welch, David Moher, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Tammy Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy Grimshaw, Manoj M. Lalu, Elizabeth Loder, Evan Mayo‐Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Andrea C. Tricco
2021-03-29

27-item checklistPRISMA 2020meta-analysesreporting guidelinessystematic reviews
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
1
PRISMA 2020 introduces a 27-item checklist and an expanded checklist with detailed recommendations for each reporting item.
2
PRISMA 2020 replaces the 2009 statement to reflect advances in systematic review methodology and terminology.
3
The revised structure and presentation are intended to facilitate implementation and improve transparent reporting of systematic reviews.
4
The update includes a dedicated abstract checklist and revised flow diagrams for original and updated systematic reviews.
5
The updated guideline provides reporting recommendations covering study identification, selection, appraisal, and synthesis.

The PRISMA 2020 reporting guideline for systematic reviews

Updated transparent reporting recommendations and tools for systematic reviews, including checklists and flow diagrams

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-03-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
105076
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Elie A. Akl
Matthew J. Page
Isabelle Boutron
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Tianjing Li
Lesley Stewart
Penny Whiting
Joanne E. McKenzie
Sue Brennan
James Thomas
Vivian Welch
David Moher
Patrick M. Bossuyt
Tammy Hoffmann
Cynthia D. Mulrow
Larissa Shamseer
Jennifer Tetzlaff
Roger Chou
Julie Glanville
Jeremy Grimshaw
Manoj M. Lalu
Elizabeth Loder
Evan Mayo‐Wilson
Steve McDonald
Luke A. McGuinness
Andrea C. Tricco
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%