AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda
Внедрение и распространение искусственного интеллекта в государственном управлении: систематический обзор литературы и перспективная повестка научных исследований
2022-10-12
SCID: 54.1/ajrgm5zf
Discuss with AI
AI adoptionAI diffusionAI tensionspublic administrationpublic value creation
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) implementation in public administration is gaining momentum heralded by the hope of smart public services that are personalised, lean, and efficient. However, the use of AI in public administration is riddled with ethical tensions of fairness, transparency, privacy, and human rights. We call these AI tensions. The current literature lacks a contextual and processual understanding of AI adoption and diffusion in public administration to be able to explore such tensions. Previous studies have outlined risks, benefits, and challenges with the use of AI in public administration. However, a large gap remains in understanding AI tensions as they relate to public value creation. Through a systematic literature review grounded in public value management and the resource-based view of the firms, we identify technology-organisational-environmental (TOE) contextual variables and absorptive capacity as factors influencing AI adoption as discussed in the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first paper that outlines distinct AI tensions from an AI implementation and diffusion perspective within public administration. We develop a future research agenda for the full AI innovation lifecycle of adoption, implementation, and diffusion.
Key Findings
1
AI adoption in public administration is influenced by technology, organisational, and environmental contextual variables, alongside organisational absorptive capacity.
2
Grounded in public value management and the resource-based view, the review connects AI adoption and diffusion with public value creation.
3
The paper outlines distinct AI tensions involving fairness, transparency, privacy, and human rights from an AI implementation and diffusion perspective.
4
The paper proposes a future research agenda spanning the full AI innovation lifecycle: adoption, implementation, and diffusion.
5
The review identifies a gap in contextual and processual understanding of AI adoption and diffusion in public administration, particularly regarding AI tensions and public value creation.
Research Object
AI adoption and diffusion in public administration
Research Subject
Contextual and processual factors shaping AI adoption and diffusion, including ethical tensions and implications for public value creation
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-10-12
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
458
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai5
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy2019
Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance2021
From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices2019
Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda2021