Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Размышления о рефлексивном тематическом анализе
2019-06-13
SCID: 54.1/n5er4dzg
Discuss with AI
conceptual mismatches in TAmethodological assumptionsreflexive commentaryreflexive thematic analysisthematic analysis
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Since initially writing on thematic analysis in 2006, the popularity of the method we outlined has exploded, the variety of TA approaches have expanded, and, not least, our thinking has developed and shifted. In this reflexive commentary, we look back at some of the unspoken assumptions that informed how we wrote our 2006 paper. We connect some of these un-identified assumptions, and developments in the method over the years, with some conceptual mismatches and confusions we see in published TA studies. In order to facilitate better TA practice, we reflect on how our thinking has evolved – and in some cases sedimented – since the publication of our 2006 paper, and clarify and revise some of the ways we phrased or conceptualised TA, and the elements of, and processes around, a method we now prefer to call reflexive TA.
Key Findings
1
Developments and diversification of TA approaches since 2006 motivate clarifying and revising how TA is phrased and conceptualized.
2
The authors propose preferring the term and framing 'reflexive thematic analysis' and clarify its elements and processes to facilitate better TA practice.
3
The authors' thinking about thematic analysis (TA) has evolved and shifted since their 2006 paper, prompting reflections and revisions.
4
This commentary connects past assumptions and method developments with practical implications for improving TA methodology and reporting.
5
Unspoken assumptions in the 2006 paper contributed to conceptual mismatches and confusions in published TA studies.
Research Object
Reflexive thematic analysis (the method of thematic analysis as reflexively conceived)
Research Subject
Conceptual assumptions, evolutions, clarifications, and methodological elements/processes of reflexive thematic analysis, including confusions in published TA studies and recommendations for better practice
Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-06-13
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest