A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Теоретическое расширение модели принятия технологий: четыре продольных полевых исследования
2000-02-01
SCID: 54.1/5kkfd45s
Discuss with AI
TAM2Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)cognitive instrumental processesimagejob relevancelongitudinal field studiesoutput qualityperceived ease of usepreimplementation, 1-month and 3-month measurementsresult demonstrabilitysocial influence processessubjective normvariance in perceived usefulness (40%–60%)variance in usage intentions (34%–52%)voluntarinessvoluntary vs mandatory usage
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The present research develops and tests a theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) that explains perceived usefulness and usage intentions in terms of social influence and cognitive instrumental processes. The extended model, referred to as TAM2, was tested using longitudinal data collected regarding four different systems at four organizations (N = 156), two involving voluntary usage and two involving mandatory usage. Model constructs were measured at three points in time at each organization: preimplementation, one month postimplementation, and three months postimplementation. The extended model was strongly supported for all four organizations at all three points of measurement, accounting for 40%–60% of the variance in usefulness perceptions and 34%–52% of the variance in usage intentions. Both social influence processes (subjective norm, voluntariness, and image) and cognitive instrumental processes (job relevance, output quality, result demonstrability, and perceived ease of use) significantly influenced user acceptance. These findings advance theory and contribute to the foundation for future research aimed at improving our understanding of user adoption behavior.
Key Findings
1
Cognitive instrumental factors (job relevance, output quality, result demonstrability, and perceived ease of use) significantly influenced user acceptance.
2
Longitudinal tests across four organizations (N = 156) with voluntary and mandatory systems supported the extended model at preimplementation, one month, and three months postimplementation.
3
Social influence factors (subjective norm, voluntariness, and image) significantly influenced user acceptance.
4
TAM2, an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model, explains perceived usefulness and usage intentions via social influence and cognitive instrumental processes.
5
The extended model accounted for 40%–60% of variance in usefulness perceptions and 34%–52% of variance in usage intentions.
Research Object
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM2) as applied to four organizational information systems
Research Subject
Determinants of perceived usefulness and usage intentions, specifically effects of social influence (subjective norm, voluntariness, image) and cognitive instrumental processes (job relevance, output quality, result demonstrability, perceived ease of use) over time
Publication Details
Publication Date
2000-02-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai1
Cited by4
A Study of the Impact of Innovation Diffusion on the Organizational Performance of Digital Logistics Platforms2026
Introducing electronic textbooks as daily‐use technology in schools: A top‐down adoption process2016
Usability, expectation, confirmation, and continuance intentions to use electronic textbooks2015
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions2008