Continue with what is already collected
Saved groups and digests add new papers to the structure the team has already built.
scid.ai brings together scientific-signal discovery and monitoring, technology-hypothesis testing, approach comparison, and decision materials—with the sources, files, graph, and work history kept alongside them. Team access, storage requirements, email workflows, and integrations are agreed through a pilot.
Papers, files, the graph, comparisons, and documents remain in one research workspace. The team can see what has been checked, which sources support a conclusion, and which question comes next.
Saved groups and digests add new papers to the structure the team has already built.
Move from a claim back to the primary source, method, data, and study limitations.
A new participant opens the workspace and sees the sources, selection, comparisons, and prepared materials.
Scientific paper search, graphs, files and sources, groups and favorites, chat, tables, formulas, reviews, documents, and recurring digests.
Team access, data requirements, email or internal-system integration, support and the set of final deliverables.
Choose the expected result. The prompt appears in the input field so you can add the topic, time horizon, and validation criteria.
A new paper can become an early signal, support a hypothesis, enter a technology shortlist, or inform a report—while every result keeps its link to the primary source.
Compare periods, methods, and research centres; separate a sustained trend from a one-off rise in publications.
Record the scientific signal, proposed mechanism, expected effect, risk, and minimum validation step.
Connect claims to supporting and contradicting papers, study design, and data limitations.
Compare solutions, organisations, maturity signals, and questions for expert assessment or a pilot.
Prepare a comparison, review, or brief with primary-source links and clear boundaries around each conclusion.
Continue a saved topic through digests and add new sources without restarting the full analysis.
The public product supports paper search, graphs, files and selected sources, research comparison in tables, reviews, documents, and digests.
A pilot defines the real topic, participants, expected result, data sources, access and storage requirements, and success criterion.
Yes, when the task requires it. Integration scope, security requirements, and storage model are agreed before the pilot starts.
Choose a task—direction monitoring, hypothesis testing, a technology shortlist, or a report. The demo will show the path from sources to a finished material and define the pilot criterion.