Keep research reasoning together with sources and decisions

scid.ai brings together scientific-signal discovery and monitoring, technology-hypothesis testing, approach comparison, and decision materials—with the sources, files, graph, and work history kept alongside them. Team access, storage requirements, email workflows, and integrations are agreed through a pilot.

Work that is easy to continue

Return to a topic with the sources, hypotheses, and findings already in place

Papers, files, the graph, comparisons, and documents remain in one research workspace. The team can see what has been checked, which sources support a conclusion, and which question comes next.

Continue with what is already collected

Saved groups and digests add new papers to the structure the team has already built.

Check the basis of every conclusion

Move from a claim back to the primary source, method, data, and study limitations.

Hand over the topic without losing context

A new participant opens the workspace and sees the sources, selection, comparisons, and prepared materials.

Discuss your workflow

Inside the research workspace

Scientific paper search, graphs, files and sources, groups and favorites, chat, tables, formulas, reviews, documents, and recurring digests.

Inside a corporate pilot

Team access, data requirements, email or internal-system integration, support and the set of final deliverables.

Start with a task the team already has

Choose the expected result. The prompt appears in the input field so you can add the topic, time horizon, and validation criteria.

From a scientific signal to material for a decision

A new paper can become an early signal, support a hypothesis, enter a technology shortlist, or inform a report—while every result keeps its link to the primary source.

Direction dynamics

Compare periods, methods, and research centres; separate a sustained trend from a one-off rise in publications.

Technology hypotheses

Record the scientific signal, proposed mechanism, expected effect, risk, and minimum validation step.

Evidence matrix

Connect claims to supporting and contradicting papers, study design, and data limitations.

Technology shortlist

Compare solutions, organisations, maturity signals, and questions for expert assessment or a pilot.

A report for discussion

Prepare a comparison, review, or brief with primary-source links and clear boundaries around each conclusion.

Recurring updates

Continue a saved topic through digests and add new sources without restarting the full analysis.

Product capabilities and pilot scope

What works without a separate implementation?

The public product supports paper search, graphs, files and selected sources, research comparison in tables, reviews, documents, and digests.

What is defined in a corporate pilot?

A pilot defines the real topic, participants, expected result, data sources, access and storage requirements, and success criterion.

Can we connect email, single sign-on or internal storage?

Yes, when the task requires it. Integration scope, security requirements, and storage model are agreed before the pilot starts.

Test scid.ai on one real topic

Choose a task—direction monitoring, hypothesis testing, a technology shortlist, or a report. The demo will show the path from sources to a finished material and define the pilot criterion.

Request a demo