scid.aiThe question stays central
Search, graph exploration and follow-up questions develop around the same research problem.
Keep the evidence behind every conclusion
Your question, selected papers and files, graph, source-grounded answers, review and document stay in one research project, so you can trace important conclusions back to their evidence.
Research continuity
Returning to a topic costs more than studying it
When papers, notes and conclusions live in separate tools, each return to the topic starts with reconstruction. scid.ai keeps the reasoning next to the sources.
The source stays with the claim
Paper pages, connections and answers over selected publications remain close at hand.
The work continues after search
Relevant papers move into favorites and groups, while the review continues into a document and export.
When the field is unfamiliar
See foundational work, recent branches, recurring methods and disagreements before deciding what deserves close reading.
When it is time to write
Return to saved arguments and primary publications so a review, paper or proposal keeps its evidence base.
Start with a real research task
Open a useful prompt, add your topic and review the wording before you send it.
From a first question to material you can defend
Each step adds context to the same body of work instead of producing another isolated answer.
Structure the field
Find foundational and recent publications, then clarify the terms and boundaries of the topic.
Check links and disagreements
Open the graph, compare approaches and locate conclusions on which authors disagree.
Continue into writing
Save papers, build a review and move the bibliography into a working document.
Questions before you start
How is this different from a regular paper search?
Search becomes the start of one project: selected sources can be explored in the graph, discussed in chat, saved and used in a review.
Can I return to the primary source?
Yes. Paper pages and links to available primary publications stay close to answers and reviews.
Is a generated review ready to publish?
No. It is working material for a researcher; critical claims, metadata and quotations still require verification.
Start with the question holding up your work
The prompt opens in the input field. Add your topic, review the wording and launch the research when you are ready.