Build the evidence base
Find papers on the technology mechanism, measured effect and experimental conditions.
Collect papers, organise candidates by function, organisation, stated readiness, effect and risk, and keep every assessment linked to a source for expert validation.
A scientific paper does not replace industrial expertise, but it can clarify the operating principle, test method, applicability boundaries and strength of the research signal.
Find papers on the technology mechanism, measured effect and experimental conditions.
Group solutions by function, material or process and compare their validation methods.
Keep the authors' limitations and the questions that a scientific paper cannot answer.
Searches scientific publications, shows connections and author affiliations, helps group sources, build a review and follow new work.
Validating TRL, suppliers, economics, industrial fit and a pilot site requires additional sources and domain assessment.
The prompt appears in the input field. Add operating conditions and selection criteria before sending it.
A useful result does not promise a ready pilot. It shows what is known, where it came from and what is still missing.
The function of the technology and the physical or chemical principle used to explain its result.
The paper, test setup and conditions under which the reported effect was obtained.
What still needs to be checked about readiness, scale-up, safety, economics and industrial conditions.
No. The self-service product primarily builds a scientific evidence base. Supplier and pilot-site discovery requires separate market and industry research.
It can record stated readiness with a source, but the final TRL must be validated by a qualified expert.
No. A query can focus on physical technologies, materials and equipment when scientific publications are available.
Start with the function and reported effect. Decide on a supplier or pilot only after a separate industry review.